ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare and analyze the technical success rate and safety between computed tomography(CT)-percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).Methods:From January 2017 to January 2022, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, the data of 76 patients who underwent gastrostomy due to inability to eat orally were collected, including 38 patients in PEG group and 38 patients in CT-PRG group. Surgical outcomes and complications were compared between the PEG and CT-PRG groups. Surgical outcomes included technical success rate, operation time, postoperative body mass index and hospital stay; while complications included minor complications (such as perifistula infection, granulation tissue proliferation, leakage, pneumoperitoneum, fistula tube obstruction, fistula tube detachment and persistent pain) and serious complications (such as bleeding, peritonitis, colonic perforation and death within 30 d). Independent sample t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact probability test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The technical success rate of CT-PRG group was higher than that of the PEG group (100.0%, 38/38 vs. 78.9%, 30/38), and the operation time was shorter than that of the PEG group ((17.16±8.52) min vs. (29.33±16.22) min), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=1.19, t=2.36; P=0.038 and 0.011). There were no significant differences in postoperative body mass index ((16.29±3.56) kg/m 2 vs. (16.12±3.17) kg/m 2) and hospital stay ((4.13±1.26) d vs. (3.52±1.13) d) between PEG group and CT-PRG group (both P>0.05). The incidence of minor complications in the PEG group was 42.1% (16/38), including 6 cases of perifistulal infection, 1 case of leakage, 5 cases of fistula tube obstruction, 1 case of fistula tube detachment, and 3 cases of persistent pain. The incidence of serious complications was 5.3% (2/38), including 1 case of bleeding and 1 case of colonic perforation. The incidence of minor complications in the CT-PRG group was 39.5% (15/38), including 5 cases of perifistula infection, 1 case of granulation tissue proliferation, 3 cases of pneumoperitoneum, 3 cases of fistula tube obstruction, 2 cases of fistula tube detachment, and 1 case of persistent pain. The incidence of serious complications was 0. There was no significant difference in the incidence of minor complications between the PEG group and the CT-PRG group ( P>0.05), while the incidence of serious complications in the CT-PRG group was lower than that of the PEG group, and the difference was statistically significant (Fisher exact probability test, P=0.043). Conclusion:PEG is a safe and effective method of gastrostomy, but for patients with esophageal obstruction, CT-PRG can be an effective supplement to PEG.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an important option for enteral nutrition for both children and adults. It is considered a safe, effective, and advantageous technique in comparison to other complementary feeding routes. It allows continuous feeding, the feeding of patients with swallowing disorders due to neurological causes or others, and the administration of non-palatable diets or medications, all with low rates of complications and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the main indications and complications of PEG in pediatric patients. In addition, the impact on the nutritional status of patients undergoing PEG was also compared with weight, body mass index (BMI), and height according to references from the World Health Organization. METHODS: This observational and retrospective study included 152 children and adolescents who underwent PEG between January/2003 and December/2018. Patients up to 18 years of age at the time of the procedure were included. Complications related to the procedure were classified as minor or major. Patients with PEG indication for nutritional supplementation were evaluated for weight gain, height, and BMI, using the Z score at the day of the procedure and six months, 1 year, and 2 years after the procedure. RESULTS: Indications for PEG were: swallowing disorder of neurological cause (67.1%), need for nutritional supplementation (25%), swallowing disorder of mechanical origin (6.6%), and indication of gastric decompression (1.3%). Minor complications occurred in 57.8% of patients and major complications in 9.8% of patients. The traction technique corresponded to 92.1% and puncture to 7.9%. The death rate was 1.3%. Thirty-eight patients had an indication for nutritional supplementation. In these patients, there was a gradual increase in both BMI and weight, reaching statistically significant differences (P=0.0340 and P= 0.0105, respectively). These differences were more evident in chronic renal disease patients. Height did not vary significantly (P=0.543). CONCLUSION: PEG proved to be an advantageous option as an auxiliary feeding method in pediatric patients. Dysphagia of neurological origin was the main indication followed by the need for nutritional supplementation. PEG has low frequency of major complications and mortality. This study also showed the importance of PEG in patients who need nutritional supplementation, as it enabled patients to move from undernutrition to normal weight ranges.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: A gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea (GEP) é uma importante opção de nutrição enteral para crianças e adultos, sendo considerada uma técnica segura, eficaz e vantajosa em comparação às outras vias de alimentação complementar. Permite a alimentação contínua, a alimentação em pacientes com distúrbios de deglutição de causa neurológica ou outros, a administração de dietas ou medicamentos não palatáveis, todos com baixos índices de complicações e mortalidade. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as principais indicações e complicações de pacientes pediátricos submetidos à GEP e o impacto no estado nutricional de pacientes submetidos à GEP para suplementação nutricional, comparando peso, índice de massa corporal (IMC) e estatura com referências da Organização Mundial de Saúde. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional e retrospectivo de 152 crianças e adolescentes submetidos à GEP, no período de janeiro/2003 a dezembro/2018. Foram incluídos pacientes até 18 anos de idade na época do procedimento. As complicações relacionadas ao procedimento foram divididas em menores e maiores. Pacientes com indicação de GEP para suplementação nutricional foram avaliados quanto ao ganho de peso, altura e IMC, por meio do escore Z no dia do procedimento e 6 meses; 1 ano; e 2 anos após o procedimento. RESULTADOS: As indicações para GEP foram distúrbio de deglutição de causa neurológica (67,1%), necessidade de suplementação nutricional (25%), distúrbio de deglutição de origem mecânica (6,6%), e indicação de descompressão gástrica (1,3%). Complicações menores ocorreram em 57,8% dos pacientes e complicações maiores em 9,8%. A técnica de tração correspondeu a 92,1% e a punção, 7,9%. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 1,3%. Trinta e oito pacientes tinham indicação de suplementação nutricional. Nestes, houve aumento gradativo tanto do IMC quanto do peso, com variação estatisticamente significativa da mediana P=0,0340 e P=0,0105, respectivamente, mais evidente nos pacientes renais crônicos. A altura não variou significativamente (P=0,543). CONCLUSÃO: A GEP mostrou-se uma opção vantajosa como forma auxiliar de alimentação em pacientes pediátricos, tendo como principais indicações a disfagia de causa neurológica e a necessidade de suplementação nutricional, com baixa prevalência de complicações maiores e mortalidade. Este estudo também mostrou a importância da GEP em pacientes com necessidade de suplementação nutricional, possibilitando a passagem dos pacientes desnutridos para escores nutricionais de peso adequados à idade.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Malnutrition , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Enteral NutritionABSTRACT
Resumen La pancreatitis aguda secundaria a la obstrucción de la papila mayor causada por la migración del balón interno es uno de los efectos secundarios poco frecuentes, pero potencialmente graves relacionados con el uso de gastrostomías endoscópicas percutáneas (PEG). Hasta ahora solo existen 15 casos reportados en el mundo, presentamos el que para nuestro conocimiento sería el caso número 16 en la literatura internacional.
Abstract Acute pancreatitis secondary to major papilla obstruction caused by intragastric balloon migration is one of the rare but potentially severe side effects associated with the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). To date, there are only 15 cases reported worldwide. This article presents a case that, to the best of our knowledge, is the sixteenth case reported in the international literature.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pancreatitis , Gastrostomy , LiteratureABSTRACT
Continuous duodenal levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel delivery by a gastrostomy infusion system improves control of Parkinson’s disease. The overall complication rates of percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy were reported to be 41% and 59% for immediate and delayed adverse events, respectively. A 72-year-old woman underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy using the delivery system noted above. Abdominal pain and vomiting occurred 3 months later. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a longitudinal ulcer extending from the lower gastric body to the ileum end, with small intestinal telescoping. Colonoscopy showed a large bezoar of food residue that was attached around the tip of the tube, reaching the ascending colon, which may have acted as an anchor. Thus, the gastric antrum and small intestine were shortened with telescoping. This complication was resolved by crushing the bezoar with forceps during colonoscopy and can be prevented by consuming a fiber-free diet and periodic exchanges of the tube using esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Abdominal Pain , Bezoars , Colon , Colon, Ascending , Colonoscopy , Diet , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Gastric Bypass , Gastrostomy , Ileum , Intestine, Small , Pyloric Antrum , Surgical Instruments , Ulcer , VomitingABSTRACT
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic Jejunostomy (PEJ) are common channels for enteral nutrition input. In the past five years, there are no relevant nursing guidelines and reviews in China. In August 2018, Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society (WOCN) issued the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nursing Management of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Jejunostomy in Adults, including preoperative preparation, surgical procedure and postoperative monitoring of gastrostomy and Jejunostomy. The management of enteral nutrition tube, the use of enteral nutrition and drugs, the prevention of medication errors, the treatment of early and late complications, the education of patients and their caregivers, and the replacement of catheters are all recommended. This article interpreted the guideline in order to provide reference for clinical nursing of gastrostomy and Jejunostomy.
ABSTRACT
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic Jejunostomy (PEJ) are common channels for enteral nutrition input. In the past five years, there are no relevant nursing guidelines and reviews in China. In August 2018, Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society (WOCN) issued the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nursing Management of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Jejunostomy in Adults, including preoperative preparation, surgical procedure and postoperative monitoring of gastrostomy and Jejunostomy. The management of enteral nutrition tube, the use of enteral nutrition and drugs, the prevention of medication errors, the treatment of early and late complications, the education of patients and their caregivers, and the replacement of catheters are all recommended. This article interpreted the guideline in order to provide reference for clinical nursing of gastrostomy and Jejunostomy.
ABSTRACT
La gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea (GEP) se utiliza como alternativa de la alimentación enteral/nasoenteral en situaciones en las que la alimentación por vía oral a largo plazo no es eficaz o no se tolera. Se prefiere principalmente en pacientes con afecciones neurológicas y, además, como apoyo de la nutrición en pacientes con enfermedades cardíacas congénitas, fibrosis quística, enfermedad intestinal inflamatoria y diversas enfermedades orofaríngeas. Si bien la colocación es sencilla en comparación con muchos procedimientos invasivos, presenta complicaciones, que incluyen desde la infección de la herida hasta la muerte. La GEP exige personal médico experimentado, antibióticos profilácticos adecuados e información exhaustiva para los pacientes o sus familias sobre el procedimiento y los cuidados posteriores. Presentamos una complicación rara, aunque importante, que surgió durante el reemplazo de la sonda de gastrostomía después del método de "corte y empuje". El tope, que debe llegar hasta el extremo distal del estómago, se desplazó hacia arriba, hasta el esófago proximal, y causó una úlcera profunda en la mucosa esofágica y una hemorragia masiva.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used as an alternative to enteral/nasoenteral feeding in situations where long-term oral feeding is ineffective or not tolerated. It is mostly preferred in patients with neurological conditions and also to support nutrition in patients with congenital heart diseases, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and various oropharyngeal diseases. Although it is easily applicable compared to many invasive procedures, it has complications ranging from wound infection to death. PEG requires experienced medical personnel, appropriate prophylactic antibiotics and exhaustive information to the patients or their families about the procedure and subsequent care. We present a rare but important complication during the replacement of the gastrostomy tube subsequent to the "cut and push" method. The bumper portions, which should move to the distal end of the stomach, moved upwards to the proximal esophagus, caused a deep ulcer in the esophageal mucosa and a massive hemorrhage.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Esophageal Diseases/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrostomy/methods , Fatal Outcome , Endoscopy , Esophageal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively safe procedure; however, no study has evaluated the safety of PEG tube placement in patients over the age of 100 years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for patients who underwent PEG tube placement. Thirty patients aged 100 years and older were identified and a random sample of 275 patients was selected for comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 80.6±16.2 years. No procedure-related deaths or major complications were identified; the overall inpatient mortality rate was 7.6%. Minor complications were noted in 4% (n=12) of the patients. Centenarian patients were predominantly female (80% [n=24] vs. 54% [n=147], p=0.006), with a mean age of 100.5±0.9 years. There was no significant difference in procedural success rates (93.3% vs. 97.4%, p=0.222) or inpatient mortality (6.7% [n=2] vs. 7.7% [n=21], p=1.000) between the two groups. However, a higher minor complication rate was noted in the older patients (13.3% [n=4] vs. 2.9% [n=8], p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Success rates, major complications and inpatient mortality associated with PEG tubes in patients aged over 100 years are comparable to those observed in relatively younger patients at our center; however minor complication rates are relatively higher. These findings lead us to believe that PEG tubes may be safely attempted in carefully selected patients in this subset of the population.
Subject(s)
Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Gastrostomy , Inpatients , Mortality , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Because of tumor compression,blockage,and anti-tumor treatment,patients with head and neck cancer or esophagus cancer often have many adverse reactions,such as dysphagia,loss of appetite,taste disappeared and so on,leading to malnutrition and weight loss,which requires nutritional support treatment.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) is a simple technology widely used in clinic which has less complications can improve patients'nutritional status and quality of life.However,the phenomenon of fistula metastasis is easy to be neglected due to lower incidence.the pathogenesis of fistula metastasis is unclear.The occurrence of complications can be reduced by preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy,overtubes,povidone iodine and a good fistula care.Surgery,interstitial brachytherapy and radiofrequency ablation therapy may be effective.This article will review the pathogenesis,prevention and prognosis of tumor metastasis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically review the effect of enteral nutrition via a naso-gastric (intestinal) tube (NG) vs a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) after liver transplantation,and provide support for the selection of proper nutrition.Methods Pub Med,web of science,Cochrane Library (Jan,2018),CNKI,VIP and Wanfang Date were search until Jan,2018.Two authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data.Discrepancies were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer,about the research of retrospective study for the effects of enteral nutrition via NG vs PEG/PEJ after liver transplantation was performed and supplemented.Publication bias were evaluated,and Meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan5.3.Results 4 studies were collected,involving 430 patients.The Meta-analysis showed that starting time of enteral nutrition of PEG/PEJ was earlier than NG (MD =-1.77,95％ CI-1.83 to-1.70,P＜0.05).The average hospitalization time of PEG/PEJ was shorter than NG (MD=-2.88,95％CI-5.19 to-0.56,P＜0.05).The diarrhea incidence of PEG/PEJ was higher than NG (OR=1.66,95％CI 1.04 to 2.65,P＜0.05),and gastroesophageal reflux incidence of PEG/PEJ was lower than NG (OR=0.29,95％CI 0.12 to 0.66,P＜0.05).The gastric retention rate of PEG/PEJ was lower than NG (OR =0.26,95％ CI 0.14 to 0.41,P＜0.05).Dislocation incidence of PEG/PEJ was lower than NG (OR =0.06,95％CI 0.01 to 0.46,P＜0.05).The pneumonia incidence of PEG/PEJ tube was lower than NG (OR=0.59,95％CI 0.36 to 0.99,P＜0.05).There were no significant differences between PEG/PEJ and NG on indwelling time,occlusion,abdominal infection,acute renal insufficiency,and acute rejection reaction.Conclusion PEG/PEJ had earlier starting time of enteral nutrition,shorter hospitalization time,lower nutrition tube placement related complications such as gastric esophagus reflux,gastric retention,dislocation rate and lower incidence of pneumonia,but the incidence of diarrhea was higher.NG is the first choice after liver transplantation,and for patients with serious basic diseases,weak digestive function or digestive system disorders PEG/PEJ can be chosen.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To present a single center's experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in infants. METHODS: Clinical records of infants who underwent PEG tube placement between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed. All patients underwent an upper gastrointestinal contrast study and an abdominal ultrasonography before the procedure. PEGs were performed with a 6-mm endoscope using the standard pull-through technique. Data regarding gestational age, birth weight, age and weight, days to feeding start, days to full diet, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. The most common indication was dysphagia related to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Median gestational age was 37 weeks (range, 24–41) and median birth weight was 2,605 grams (560–4,460). Patients underwent PEG procedures at a median age of 114 days (48–350); mean weight was 5.1 kg (3.2–8.8). In all patients but one, a 12-Fr tube was positioned. Median feeding start was 3 days (1–5) and on average full diet was achieved 5 days after the procedure (2–11). Six minor complications were recorded and effectively treated in the outpatient clinic; no major complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: PEG is safe and feasible in infants when performed by highly experienced physicians.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Birth Weight , Deglutition Disorders , Diet , Endoscopes , Gastrostomy , Gestational Age , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
Objective To understand the effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy(POEM)for achalasia and secondary severe malnutrition in children and the effectiveness of nutrition support before and after POEM.Method Treatment of POEM,nutrition support(tube feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy three months before operation)in one case were recorded and analyzed.Results POEM was successful without any complication such as perforation,bleeding,and pneumoderm.The child suffered from fever after surgery,which was dissolved after symptomatic treatment three days later.Chest pain was relieved after changing position.The diet was changed from liquid to semifluid,and then to normal diet.The child did not have dysphagia.During the 6-month follow-up,the patient had normal diets by oral route.The weight was 32 kg before achalasia and decreased to 18 kg after 9 months(at admission);it then increased to 29 kg after short-time(12 days)parenteral nutrition and long-time(3 months)enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy,and then the patient received POEM.His weight was 30,31,31,29,and 31 kg 1,4,6,9,and 13 months,respectively,after POEM.Conclusion POEM can effectively cure achalasia in pediatric patients and improve the quality of life.Rational enteral nutrition can improve nutrition status and facilitate a successful POEM.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical application and security of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with the Introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy in dysphagia patients. Methods Clinical data of 22 cases dysphagia patients implemented with PEG with the Introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy or conventional gastroseopy were retrospectively analyzed, the clinical effect and the complication were observed. Results 22 patients underwent PEG with the Introducer method using conventional gastroscopy (6 cases) or ultrathin gastroscopy (16 cases). Among the 16 patients underwent PEG using ultrathin gastroseopy by transnasal or peroral approach, 2 cases with trimus by received radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer and 14 cases with pharyngeal or esophagus narrowing, could not completed PEG by conventional gastroscopy. The average procedure time of PEG was (12.2 ± 2.9) min in conventional gastroscopy group and (11.8 ± 3.2) min in control group. No complications were observed in these patients, but the patients in ultrathin gastroseopy group reported less discomfort associated with the procedure. 17 patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and esophagus cancer who received PEG could completely finished 6 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Paired-sample t test of nutrition indicators (hemoglobin, albumin and RBC) before and after the treatment showed significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion PEG with the introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy is a safe and effective method of enteral nutrition, Ultrathin gastroscopy reduces the discomfort of the procedure, especially in patients with serious trimus and pharyngeal or esophagus narrowing. For patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, preventative PEG improved the tolerance of chemoradiotherapy,reduce the incidence of adverse events.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical application and security of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with the Introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy in dysphagia patients. Methods Clinical data of 22 cases dysphagia patients implemented with PEG with the Introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy or conventional gastroseopy were retrospectively analyzed, the clinical effect and the complication were observed. Results 22 patients underwent PEG with the Introducer method using conventional gastroscopy (6 cases) or ultrathin gastroscopy (16 cases). Among the 16 patients underwent PEG using ultrathin gastroseopy by transnasal or peroral approach, 2 cases with trimus by received radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer and 14 cases with pharyngeal or esophagus narrowing, could not completed PEG by conventional gastroscopy. The average procedure time of PEG was (12.2 ± 2.9) min in conventional gastroscopy group and (11.8 ± 3.2) min in control group. No complications were observed in these patients, but the patients in ultrathin gastroseopy group reported less discomfort associated with the procedure. 17 patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and esophagus cancer who received PEG could completely finished 6 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Paired-sample t test of nutrition indicators (hemoglobin, albumin and RBC) before and after the treatment showed significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion PEG with the introducer method using ultrathin gastroseopy is a safe and effective method of enteral nutrition, Ultrathin gastroscopy reduces the discomfort of the procedure, especially in patients with serious trimus and pharyngeal or esophagus narrowing. For patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, preventative PEG improved the tolerance of chemoradiotherapy,reduce the incidence of adverse events.
ABSTRACT
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes were often offered to patients requiring long term enteral feeding. Even though the procedure is relatively safe, it is associated with various complications such as peritonitis or even death. 1 We presented a case of a 54-year-old gentleman with underlying ischemic stroke and pus discharges from a recently inserted PEG tube. Computed Topography (CT) scan confirmed abdominal wall necrotising fasciitis complicated with hyperosmolar hyperglycaemia state (HHS) and later succumbed after 48 hours of admission. Our case illustrated the rare complication related to the insertion of PEG tube; abdominal wall necrotising fasciitis that was associated with mortality.
Subject(s)
GastrostomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: With the notable exceptions of dementia, stroke, and motor neuron disease, relatively little is known about the safety and utility of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion in patients with neurodegenerative disease. We aimed to determine the safety and utility of PEG feeding in the context of neurodegenerative disease and to complete a literature review in order to identify whether particular factors need to be considered to improve safety and outcome. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of patients referred for PEG insertion by neurologists in a single neuroscience center was conducted according to a pre-determined set of standards. For the literature review, we identified references from searches of PubMed, mainly with the search items “percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy” and “neurology” or “neurodegenerative disease.” RESULTS: Short-term mortality and morbidity associated with PEG in patients with neurological disease were significant. Age greater than 75 years was associated with poor outcome, and a trend toward adverse outcome was observed in patients with low serum albumin. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the relatively high risk of PEG in patients with neurodegenerative disease. We present points for consideration to improve outcome in this particularly vulnerable group of patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Dementia , Gastrostomy , Mortality , Motor Neuron Disease , Multiple Sclerosis , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Neurosciences , Parkinson Disease , Retrospective Studies , Serum Albumin , StrokeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To determine the technical feasibility and success rate of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) after failure of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for PRG after failure of PEG between May 2011 and June 2016 were included in this study. The reasons for the failure of PEG, as well as the technical success and complications of PRG were noted. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (14 men, 1 woman; age, 27-93 years) were included. The most common reasons for PEG failure were esophageal stricture due to malignancies (n = 8), unfavorable abdominal wall conditions (n = 3), unstable patient condition during endoscopy (n = 2), and other miscellaneous conditions (n = 2). PRG placement was technically successful in all 15 cases. In one case, early slip-out of the gastrostomy tube occurred, which required removal and repositioning. No mortality was noted. CONCLUSION: PRG is technically feasible in patients with failed PEG insertion, and has advantages over PEG and a high overall success rate.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Abdominal Wall , Endoscopy , Esophageal Stenosis , Gastrostomy , MortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Esophageal stricture is usually managed with outpatient endoscopic dilation. However, patients with food impaction or failure to thrive undergo inpatient dilation. Esophageal perforation is the most feared complication, and its risk in inpatient setting is unknown. METHODS: We used National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2007–2013. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify patients with esophageal strictures. Logistic regression was used to assess association between hospital/patient characteristics and utilization of esophageal dilation. RESULTS: There were 591,187 hospitalizations involving esophageal stricture; 4.2% were malignant. Endoscopic dilation was performed in 28.7% cases. Dilation was more frequently utilized (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; p<0.001), had higher in-hospital mortality (3.1% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001), and resulted in longer hospital stays (5 days vs. 4 days, p=0.01), among cases of malignant strictures. Esophageal perforation was more common in the malignant group (0.9% vs. 0.5%, p=0.007). Patients with malignant compared to benign strictures undergoing dilation were more likely to require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy (PEG/J) tube (14.1% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001). Palliative care services were utilized more frequently in malignant stricture cases not treated with dilation compared to those that were dilated. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient endoscopic dilation was utilized in 29% cases of esophageal stricture. Esophageal perforation, although infrequent, is more common in malignant strictures.
Subject(s)
Humans , Constriction, Pathologic , Esophageal Perforation , Esophageal Stenosis , Failure to Thrive , Gastrostomy , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Inpatients , International Classification of Diseases , Jejunostomy , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Outpatients , Palliative CareABSTRACT
To compare the complications and mortality related to gastrostomy procedures performed using surgical and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques, this review covered seven studies. Five of these were retrospective and two were randomized prospective studies. In total, 406 patients were involved, 232 of whom had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and 174 of whom had undergone surgical gastrostomy. The analysis was performed using Review Manager. Risk differences were computed using a fixed-effects model and forest and funnel plots. Data on risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the Mantel-Haenszel test. There was no difference in major complications in retrospective (95% CI (-0.11 to 0.10)) or randomized (95% CI (-0.07 to 0.05)) studies. Regarding minor complications, no difference was found in retrospective studies (95% CI (-00.17 to 0.09)), whereas a difference was observed in randomized studies (95% CI (-0.25 to -0.02)). Separate analyses of retrospective and randomized studies revealed no differences between the methods in relation to mortality and major complications. Moreover, low levels of minor complications were observed among endoscopic procedures in randomized studies, with no difference observed compared with retrospective studies.
Subject(s)
Humans , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Gastrostomy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/mortality , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/mortality , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Peritonitis/etiology , Pneumonia, Aspiration/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
<b>Background:</b> There has been debate over the indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in recent years in Japan. In addition, the level of satisfaction of patients and patient’s family after PEG remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of PEG and the level of satisfaction of patients and patients’ families after PEG in Japan.<br><b>Methods:</b> We reviewed the existing data of all patients who underwent PEG tube insertion at Yuri Kumiai General Hospital (Akita, Japan) between February 2000 and December 2010. We examined the following points: underlying diseases requiring PEG, levels of consciousness, and performance status. We also sent a questionnaire to the patients and patient’s families to ask about their satisfaction with and thoughts about PEG.<br><b>Results:</b> The data of 545 patients who underwent PEG were reviewed. There were 295 men and 250 women, with a mean age of 77.2 ± 11.4 years. PEG was indicated most frequently for cerebrovascular disorders (48.2%, 239/545). There were 515 (94.4%, 515/545) patients showing consciousness disturbance and 444 (81.5%, 444/545) bedridden patients. The questionnaire was answered by one patient himself and 316 patients’ families. When asked, “Was performing PEG a good decision?”, 57.5% (182/316) of the patients’ families answered yes. Meanwhile, when patients’ family members were asked if they would wish to undergo PEG if they were in the same condition as the patient, 28.4% (90/316) answered yes, whereas 55.3% (175/316) answered no.<br><b>Conclusions:</b> Few patients were able to make their own decision about PEG tube placement because of consciousness disturbance. As a result, many family members of the patients did not want to experience PEG for themselves. Future studies should be performed to clarify the quality of life and ethical aspects associated with PEG.